Tag Archives: Quantum Efficiency

illuminant, Information Science, Quantization, Sensors, SPD, variation

Photons, Shot Noise and Poisson Processes

Leave a comment

Every digital photographer soon discovers that there are three main sources of visible random noise that affect pictures taken in normal conditions: Shot, pixel response non-uniformities (PRNU) and Read noise.[1]

Shot noise (sometimes referred to as Photon Shot Noise or Photon Noise) we learn is ‘inherent in light’; PRNU is per pixel gain variation proportional to light, mainly affecting the brighter portions of our pictures; Read Noise is instead independent of light, introduced by the electronics and visible in the darker shadows.  You can read in this earlier post a little more detail on how they interact.

Read Noise Shot Photon PRNU Photo Resonse Non Uniformity

However, shot noise is omnipresent and arguably the dominant source of visible noise in typical captures.  This article’s objective is to  dig deeper into the sources of Shot Noise that we see in our photographs: is it really ‘inherent in the incoming light’?  What about if the incoming light went through clouds or was reflected by some object at the scene?  And what happens to the character of the noise as light goes through the lens and is turned into photoelectrons by a pixel’s photodiode?

Fish, dear reader, fish and more fish.

Continue reading Photons, Shot Noise and Poisson Processes →

Color, Exposure, Photometry, Radiometry, Sensors

Connecting Photographic Raw Data to Tristimulus Color Science

Leave a comment

Absolute Raw Data

In the previous article we determined that the three r_{_L}g_{_L}b_{_L} values recorded in the raw data in the center of the image plane in units of Data Numbers per pixel – by a digital camera and lens as a function of absolute spectral radiance L(\lambda) at the lens – can be estimated as follows:

(1)   \begin{equation*} r_{_L}g_{_L}b_{_L} =\frac{\pi p^2 t}{4N^2} \int\limits_{380}^{780}L(\lambda) \odot SSF_{rgb}(\lambda) d\lambda \end{equation*}

with subscript _L indicating absolute-referred units and SSF_{rgb} the three system Spectral Sensitivity Functions.   In this series of articles \odot is wavelength by wavelength multiplication (what happens to the spectrum of light as it progresses through the imaging system) and the integral just means the area under each of the three resulting curves (integration is what the pixels do during exposure).  Together they represent an inner or dot product.  All variables in front of the integral were previously described and can be considered constant for a given photographic setup. Continue reading Connecting Photographic Raw Data to Tristimulus Color Science →

Color, Exposure, Photometry, Radiometry, Sensors

The Physical Units of Raw Data

Leave a comment

In the previous article we (I) learned that the Spectral Sensitivity Functions of a given digital camera and lens are the result of the interaction of light from the scene with all of the spectrally varied components that make up the imaging system: mainly the lens, ultraviolet/infrared hot mirror, Color Filter Array and other filters, finally the photoelectric layer of the sensor, which is normally silicon in consumer kit.

Figure 1. The journey of light from source to sensor.  Cone Ω will play a starring role in the narrative that follows.

In this one we will put the process on a more formal theoretical footing, setting the stage for the next few on the role of white balance.

Continue reading The Physical Units of Raw Data →

Color, Exposure, Photometry, Radiometry, Sensors

The Spectral Response of Digital Cameras

2 Comments

Photography works because visible light from one or more sources reaches the scene and is reflected in the direction of the camera, which then captures a signal proportional to it.  The journey of light can be described in integrated units of power all the way to the sensor, for instance so many watts per square meter. However ever since Newton we have known that such total power is in fact the result of the weighted sum of contributions by every frequency  that makes up the light, what he called its spectrum.

Our ability to see and record color depends on knowing the distribution of the power contained within a subset of these frequencies and how it interacts with the various objects in its path.  This article is about how a typical digital camera for photographers interacts with such a spectrum from the scene: we will dissect what is sometimes referred to as the system’s Spectral Response or Sensitivity.

Figure 1. Spectral Sensitivity Functions of an arbitrary imaging system, resulting from combining the responses of the various components described in the article.

Continue reading The Spectral Response of Digital Cameras →

Equivalence, Exposure, IQ, Sensors

Equivalence and Equivalent Image Quality: Signal

1 Comment

One of the fairest ways to compare the performance of two cameras of different physical characteristics and specifications is to ask a simple question: which photograph would look better if the cameras were set up side by side, captured identical scene content and their output were then displayed and viewed at the same size?

Achieving this set up and answering the question is anything but intuitive because many of the variables involved, like depth of field and sensor size, are not those we are used to dealing with when taking photographs.  In this post I would like to attack this problem by first estimating the output signal of different cameras when set up to capture Equivalent images.

It’s a bit long so I will give you the punch line first:  digital cameras of the same generation set up equivalently will typically generate more or less the same signal in e^- independently of format.  Ignoring noise, lenses and aspect ratio for a moment and assuming the same camera gain and number of pixels, they will produce identical raw files. Continue reading Equivalence and Equivalent Image Quality: Signal →

Exposure, Sensors

What is the Effective Quantum Efficiency of my Sensor?

Leave a comment

Now that we know how to determine how many photons impinge on a sensor we can estimate its Effective Quantum Efficiency, that is the efficiency with which it turns such a photon flux (n_{ph}) into photoelectrons (n_{e^-} ), which will then be converted to raw data to be stored in the capture’s raw file:

(1)   \begin{equation*} EQE = \frac{n_{e^-} \text{ produced by average pixel}}{n_{ph} \text{ incident on average pixel}} \end{equation*}

I call it ‘Effective’, as opposed to ‘Absolute’, because it represents the probability that a photon arriving on the sensing plane from the scene will be converted to a photoelectron by a given pixel in a digital camera sensor.  It therefore includes the effect of microlenses, fill factor, CFA and other filters on top of silicon in the pixel.  Whether Effective or Absolute, QE is usually expressed as a percentage, as seen below in the specification sheet of the KAF-8300 by On Semiconductor, without IR/UV filters:

For instance if  an average of 100 photons per pixel were incident on a uniformly lit spot on the sensor and on average each pixel produced a signal of 20 photoelectrons we would say that the Effective Quantum Efficiency of the sensor is 20%.  Clearly the higher the EQE the better for Image Quality parameters such as SNR. Continue reading What is the Effective Quantum Efficiency of my Sensor? →