Tag Archives: BSI

Sampling in Imaging

This article and the following one will discuss the effect on resolution of digitizing a continuous optical image.

The sampling process carried out by the sensor results in digital values corresponding to an intensity at each pixel’s location.  These so-called Data Numbers are stored ideally as-is in the raw file and are proportional to infinitesimal point samples of a new continuous image: the optical image smoothed by the characteristics of the pixels’ effective active area, known as the pixel aperture function.

Figure 1. Simulated Pixel Aperture Function of a 4um pitch Back Side Illuminated pixel in isolation.  Note diffusion beyond the -2/+2um theoretical pixel boundaries suggested by pitch.

Smoothing by a finite pixel area reduces resolution. Continue reading Sampling in Imaging

Equivalence and Equivalent Image Quality: Signal

One of the fairest ways to compare the performance of two cameras of different physical characteristics and specifications is to ask a simple question: which photograph would look better if the cameras were set up side by side, captured identical scene content and their output were then displayed and viewed at the same size?

Achieving this set up and answering the question is anything but intuitive because many of the variables involved, like depth of field and sensor size, are not those we are used to dealing with when taking photographs.  In this post I would like to attack this problem by first estimating the output signal of different cameras when set up to capture Equivalent images.

It’s a bit long so I will give you the punch line first:  digital cameras of the same generation set up equivalently will typically generate more or less the same signal in e^- independently of format.  Ignoring noise, lenses and aspect ratio for a moment and assuming the same camera gain and number of pixels, they will produce identical raw files. Continue reading Equivalence and Equivalent Image Quality: Signal